Search for: "Union and ERISA Law" Results 1 - 20 of 721
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2019, 8:10 am by McKennon Law Group PC
  Senator Jacob Javits, a sponsor of ERISA, observed at the time that … The post The Basics of an ERISA Life, Health and Disability Insurance Claim – Part One: ERISA Background, Purpose and Timing Requirements appeared first on McKennon Law Group PC. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:21 am by John Tucker
When the law was finalized, ALL employee benefits - not just pensions - were incorporated into ERISA's framework. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 7:03 am by McKennon Law Group
Thus, benefit plans created under a collective bargaining agreement between a union and a government entity are not covered by ERISA. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 4:08 am by McKennon Law Group
At McKennon Law Group, our attorneys work alongside beneficiaries with unions or employer-supplied life insurance policies that involve issues laid out in ERISA, Employee Retirement Income Security Act. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:21 am by McKennon Law Group
Thus, benefit plans created by state or local governments or plans under a collective bargaining agreement between a union and a governmental entity are not covered by ERISA. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:33 pm by McKennon Law Group
  For example, if the benefits in question were actually obtained through a union, ERISA may control because the benefits were not provided by the government entity, but rather, they were provided by an employee organization: the union. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:21 am by McKennon Law Group
Thus, benefit plans created by state or local governments or plans under a collective bargaining agreement between a union and a governmental entity are not covered by ERISA. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:39 am by McKennon Law Group
The Boeing Company Non-Union Long-Term Disability Plan, Plan Number 625, an ERISA Plan, 856 F.3d 686 (9th Cir. 2017). [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Ann Caresani
ERISA sets forth the procedure for fund trustees to collect for nonpayment, and would seemingly preempt such a state law. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:33 am by Stanley D. Baum
In analyzing the case, the Court said that ERISA section 514 preempts all state laws that "relate to" any employee benefit plan. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 2:45 am
  The questions and answers below on the ERISA fidelity bonding requirements were prepared by the Department of Labor which is the governmental agency which is in charge of enforcing the ERISA laws and regulations. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:00 am by Richard D. Worth
Contrary to Smith Barney’s argument, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania relied upon the Third Circuit’s holding in Glaziers and Glassworkers Union Local No. 252 Annuity Fund v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:54 am
  Thus, even if the state of New Jersey can confer all state law rights pertaining to marriage on civil union partners, those are merely STATE law rights, and in ERISA the federal government has apparently divested the states of the power to compel private employers to refrain from sexual orientation discrimination in the establishment and implementation of their employee benefit plans that are subject to ERISA. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:17 pm by Stephen D. Rosenberg
While the details of the decision will be of immense interest – I am sure – to appellate mavens (oh where have you gone, Appellate Law & Practice blog?) [read post]