Search for: "Union and ERISA Law" Results 61 - 80 of 719
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2011, 5:30 pm
Such was the case during my early involvement with ERISA in the mid-1970s which included administration of multiemployer plans. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 5:30 pm
Such was the case during my early involvement with ERISA in the mid-1970s which included administration of multiemployer plans. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 5:30 pm
Such was the case during my early involvement with ERISA in the mid-1970s which included administration of multiemployer plans. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 12:15 pm
Well, my trial’s still ongoing, and I find myself short of time to really comment in any detail on the latest details in the always percolating and never quiet world of ERISA and insurance law. [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:03 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
I thought of this when I saw Mike Reilly’s interesting post last week on the test for determining whether a plan is a governmental plan or not, because I have been leading off stories about governmental plan and other exemptions from ERISA for many years with the story of a client who, in 1975, was assigned this “new law” to oversee for his employer, with the “new law,” of course, being ERISA. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:36 pm
A very big day in labor & employment law and ERISA cases at the U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:47 am
  Moreover, they assert, their state law claims are the types of claims federal courts have consistently held are not even defensively preempted under ERISA § 514. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 6:33 am by Stanley D. Baum
Further, courts have recognized that an employer has a federal common law action for restitution of mistakenly made payments to an ERISA plan. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
An expert from Vermont, which in 2000 became thefirst jurisdiction in the United States to enact a civil union law, testified that civil union couplesthere still face problems with the law today. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 2:37 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The injunctive order steps from a dispute between both unions over which union is entitled to represent a group of workers. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:45 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Fees and other compensation must be set appropriately and properly reported in accordance with ERISA’s fee disclosure rules. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:13 am by Mike
Creteguard is another ERISA case, this one is of the labor union complaining of a lack of contribution to a pension fund variety. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 5:42 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  While UHG works to remediate and restore the operability and security of the Choice Health tools and systems, health plans, and insurers, their fiduciaries, plan sponsors, and fiduciaries should take timely and prudent steps in response to the breach and resulting disruptions to mitigate the exposure of their health plans, and themselves under HIPAA and ERISA. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 5:56 am
Professor Sturm College of Law University of Denver Denver [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 3:48 am by John Tucker
  ERISA is the federal law that regulates your employee benefits if you work (or worked) for a private (non-government or church) employer. [read post]
Under ERISA, a “trade or business” within a “controlled group” can be liable for the ERISA Title IV pension obligations (including withdrawal liability for union multiemployer plans) of any other member of the controlled group. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:37 pm
Brown, the Court ruled that federal labor law prohibits states from regulating an employer’s right to speak out about union organizing by its employees. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:38 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Pursuant to LMRDA Section 203(a), employers must also file the Form LM-10 to report certain payments to unions and individuals affiliated with unions, including any officer, employee, shop steward, or agent of a labor organization. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
All affected workers benefited from the WPL, regardless of union membership, and the law did not treat employers differently based on whether they employed unionized workers. [read post]