Search for: "United States v. Pinto" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2019, 6:24 am by Joel R. Brandes
Third, she argued she should not have to reimburse Pinto for enforcing the Mexican custody order since she claimed her Mexican lawyer said she could take the children to the United States without violating that order. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:12 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Because the children habitually resided in Mexico, and because de Loera admitted removing and retaining her children in the United States, Pinto proved the first prong of wrongful removal. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 7:58 am by Steven Cohen
United States District Court – Southern District of New York – March 4th, 2019) involves an accessibility claim. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 9:57 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This Court in #4 above is citing the United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals case styled, Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:40 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Southern District, Houston Division, issued an opinion in June 2012, dealing with this issue. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:14 pm
It must have been a showstopper, because after hearing defense counsel's opening statement and before hearing any evidence, a juror in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 12:20 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
The opinion was issued on June 7, 2011, by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 3:55 am by INFORRM
The cases below were referred to in the Court’s judgment: – Halford v the United Kingdom (25 June 1997), which concerned an office landline designated for personal use. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United Kingdom, the workplace surveillance was predicated upon suspicions of criminal activity, and in Copland v. [read post]