Search for: "United States v. Shaver" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2013, 6:00 am by LTA-Editor
By Shira Zucker This August, Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Texas ruled in SEC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
From a supplement to a self-represented appellant's brief in Shaver v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 12:46 am by Arina Shulga
It can be used to purchase goods or services, and as Shavers stated, used to pay for individual living expenses. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Shavers argued that the BTCST investments are not securities because Bitcoin is not money, and is “not part of anything regulated by the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
” Judge Mazzant wrote: “Shavers argues that the BTCST investments are not securities because Bitcoin is not money, and is not part of anything regulated by the United States. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Shavers and Bitcoin Savings and TrustCase number: 13-cv-00416 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas)Case filed: July 23, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 18, 2014 10/23/2014 01/21/2015 2014-106 SEC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:40 am
 The facts in Case C-446/09 In 2002, the Belgian customs authorities inspected a cargo – which lacked a stated destination and was warehoused in the port of Antwerp (Belgium) – of electric shavers from Shanghai (China) resembling designs of shavers developed by Philips. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 10:22 am by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
From offices in downtown Chicago and Oak Brook, we represent people throughout Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin and the entire United States. [read post]