Search for: "United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2014, 3:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In deciding whether preemption was the legally required outcome, the Court looked to and applied the landmark preemption analysis case White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 9:08 am by Native American Rights Fund
Legislation Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/115_uslegislation.html The following bills were added:S.2850: A bill to amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2020 to clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:47 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Wheeler (435US313) — Recognition of inherent tribal authority to prosecute Indians as a separate sovereign v. (18) White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 11:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2018.html White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Legislation Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/115_uslegislation.html The following bills were added: S.2850: A bill to amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2020 to clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm by John Elwood
Video Gaming Technologies Inc., 19-1298Issue: Whether a generally applicable state ad valorem tax, as assessed against personal property owned by a non-Indian, out-of-state corporate entity and leased to a tribe for use in its casino operations, is preempted by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and the Supreme Court’s “particularized inquiry” balancing test from White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
Video Gaming Technologies Inc., 19-1298Issue: Whether a generally applicable state ad valorem tax, as assessed against personal property owned by a non-Indian, out-of-state corporate entity and leased to a tribe for use in its casino operations, is preempted by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and the Supreme Court’s “particularized inquiry” balancing test from White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]