Search for: "United Air Lines, Inc. v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2013, 2:16 pm by Peter Steinmeyer
United Air Lines, Inc. and Allied Aviation Services, Inc., the defendants sought discovery related to the plaintiff’s social activities, and made a document request for “documents and information related to social media accounts maintained by Plaintiff. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:41 pm by WIMS
[#Air, #Transport, #Land, #CA3]Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
15 May 2018, 3:48 pm by H. Scott Leviant
Delta Air Lines, Inc., the Court asked for review of the following three questions:(1) Do California Labor Code §§ 204 and 226 apply to wage payments and wage statements provided by an out-of-state employer to an employee who, in the relevant pay period, works in California only episodically and for less than a day at a time? [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 6:18 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the issuance of Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 18 emergency exemptions to the states of Georgia, Minnesota, and Utah permitting the use of BiaXamTM B110-V and BiaXamTM B110-P (BiaXam), adhesive film used as supplemental residual surface coating, in Delta Air Lines planes and facilities in those three states. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
The Parties The Complainant is Facebook Inc. of Palo Alto, California, the United States of America, represented by Heller Ehrman LLP, the United States of America. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:09 pm by Matthew David Brozik
One of the plaintiffs is Darth Vader, and the defendant is none other than the most powerful entity in this solar system, the United States of America…! [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:11 pm
United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, the Supreme Court stated two conditions for being perceived as disabled: (1) a covered entity mistakenly believes that a person has a physical impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities or (2) a covered entity mistakenly believes that an acutal, non-limiting impairment substantially limits one or more major life activities. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:04 am by Sheppard Mullin
Driscoll-Chippendale (202) 469-4921 JDriscoll-Chippendale@sheppardmullin.com  [1] The following airlines were named as defendants in plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint: Air Canada, Alaska Airlines, Alaska AirGroup, Inc., ATA Airlines, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., America West Airlines, Inc., Continental Airlines Inc., Delta Air Lines, Inc., Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., Horizon Air… [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:17 am by John L. Welch
The United States Supreme Court has affirmed the decision of the U.S. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:25 pm by Mona Solouki
(import "generally denotes a product (or perhaps a service) [that] has been brought into the United States from abroad") (quoting Turicentro S.A. v. [read post]