Search for: "United State v. Barker"
Results 1 - 20
of 119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
In a controversial decision issued on February 25, a federal judge ruled that a moratorium on residential evictions, issued by the the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, violates the United States Constitution.In Terkel v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
In a controversial decision issued on February 25, a federal judge ruled that a moratorium on residential evictions, issued by the the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, violates the United States Constitution.In Terkel v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
In a controversial decision issued on February 25, a federal judge ruled that a moratorium on residential evictions, issued by the the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, violates the United States Constitution.In Terkel v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
In a controversial decision issued on February 25, a federal judge ruled that a moratorium on residential evictions, issued by the the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, violates the United States Constitution.In Terkel v. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 10:32 am
In cases like United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 2:38 pm
Given the open-textured nature of the relevant constitutional text, "the question of congressional power under the Commerce Clause 'is necessarily one of degree.'" United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
United States, a case involving the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:37 pm
The concept stems from the Supreme Court of the United States’ ruling in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:49 pm
(as he then was) stated in Collins v. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 5:16 am
Hollingsworth & Caroline Barker, & [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 9:50 am
United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 7:27 pm
BARKER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Mitigated negative declaration on conversion of apartments to hotel upheld against claim of impact based on loss of rent-stabilized units; baseline did not include any such units. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 4:45 am
Harvey, 181 U.S. 481 (1901) and United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 7:36 pm
United States, "The events which occurred, although they took some time, were only the natural consequences of the [government's actions]. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:09 pm
United States, 568 U.S. 23, 37 (2012) remains the polestar for flooding cases, and that provided the lens through which the CFC looked at the facts and the law. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 3:45 am
Schramm & Ekaterina Yahyaoui Krivenko, Germany v Italy Marta Carneiro, Kirsten Ketscher & Freya Semanda, Gómez-Limón Sánchez-Camacho v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and others Sara Bengtson, Damian Gonzalez-Salzberg, Loveday Hodson & Paul Johnson, Christine Goodwin v the United Kingdom Amel Alghrani, Amal Ali & Jill Marshall, Leyla Sahin v Turkey Nicola Barker, Burden v the… [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 10:17 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm
Indie-v-PlanB-Complaint [read post]
