Search for: "United State v. Barker"
Results 41 - 60
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2016, 7:38 am
Justice Kagan pointed out that in a prior case (United States v. $8,850, a 1983 forfeiture case), the Court had ruled that “we’re going to do a due process analysis, but we’re going to take the [Speedy Trial Clause] Barker factors as our test. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 6:48 am
Bell-v-Cystic-Complaint [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:22 am
Normally, Justice Sotomayor notes, the Court would not grant cert. to resolve simply a mistaken application, or even an erroneous fact-bound determination, of the four Barker v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:30 pm
Meanwhile, modern precedents such as the Court’s 1971 decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:52 pm
In United States v.Velazquez, No 12-3992 (3d. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:55 pm
The constitutional standard for a speedy trial was established by the United States Supreme Court in a case called Barker v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:09 pm
See Barker v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 7:49 am
Judge Marcus wrote that the Court was bound by United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 11:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:32 am
The Court applied the analytical framework as articulated in Barker v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:51 am
Fellow Kat Darren, together with his EIP colleague Robert Barker, write up the Idenix v Gilead litigation over whether a document cited as prior art in a patent validity dispute over novelty is entitled to its priority date, on the jiplp weblog here. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
"The Los Angeles Review of Books reviews Clark Stoeckley's The United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
Also from the VC, see Supreme Court to Hear Potentially Important Property Rights Case, about SCOTUS agreeing to review the following question: In determining whether the Due Process Clause requires a State or local government to provide a post-seizure probable cause hearing prior to a statutory judicial forfeiture proceeding and, if so, when such a hearing must take place, should district courts apply the "speedy trial" test employed in United States… [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 2:38 pm
Given the open-textured nature of the relevant constitutional text, "the question of congressional power under the Commerce Clause 'is necessarily one of degree.'" United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:57 am
Under prior law, if the fraud involved conduct in the United States or had an effect in the United States, victims had a private right to bring suit. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 10:32 am
In cases like United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:07 pm
Jesse V. [read post]
