Search for: "United State v. Barker" Results 61 - 80 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2012, 8:45 pm by Matthew Bush
Eldridge or the test employed in Barker v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:38 am by Rory Little
Justice Kagan pointed out that in a prior case (United States v. $8,850, a 1983 forfeiture case), the Court had ruled that “we’re going to do a due process analysis, but we’re going to take the [Speedy Trial Clause] Barker factors as our test. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:22 am by Rory Little
Normally, Justice Sotomayor notes, the Court would not grant cert. to resolve simply a mistaken application, or even an erroneous fact-bound determination, of the four Barker v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:30 pm by Rory Little
Meanwhile, modern precedents such as the Court’s 1971 decision in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:55 pm
The constitutional standard for a speedy trial was established by the United States Supreme Court in a case called Barker v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 7:49 am
Judge Marcus wrote that the Court was bound by United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court ordinarily rejects criminal cases for review absent a material split of opinions in the state appellate courts, federal appellate courts, or both, unless the Court finds a compelling Constitutional question to justify review nonetheless. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:32 am
The Court applied the analytical framework as articulated in Barker v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 12:04 pm
Degelmann, 29 F.3d 295, 300-01 (7th Cir. 1994); United States v. [read post]