Search for: "United State v. Barker" Results 81 - 100 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2013, 7:34 am by The Charge
United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992), the defendant was unable to point to specific facts illustrating that the delay harmed his ability to defend himself adequately. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:25 am by John L. Welch
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.December 2, 2010 - 10 AM: The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:06 am by Rory Little
Applying due process principles under Montana state law as well as United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
The government gets the very malleable and forgiving multifactor test of Barker v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:38 pm by Zosha Millman
Batoff of Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel on their HR Legalist Disney’s Influence on United States Copyright Law – Sacramento lawyer Josh H. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
The government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 882 P.2d 298, 308-09 (Cal. 1994); Barker v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:11 am by Susan Brenner
In Omychund v Barker (1745) 1 Atk, 21, 49; 26 ER 15, 33, Lord Harwicke stated that no evidence was admissible unless it was `the best that the nature of the case will allow’. [read post]