Search for: "United State v. Barker"
Results 101 - 120
of 175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:25 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.December 2, 2010 - 10 AM: The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:11 am
In Omychund v Barker (1745) 1 Atk, 21, 49; 26 ER 15, 33, Lord Harwicke stated that no evidence was admissible unless it was `the best that the nature of the case will allow’. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 5:09 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:52 am
The Appellate Division, citing a number of cases including Matter of Board of Educ. of Barker Cent. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 882 P.2d 298, 308-09 (Cal. 1994); Barker v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 6:55 am
"The delay of which he complains, although not as long as in some other cases, see Doggett, 505 U.S. at 648 (eight and one half year delay); United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:02 pm
United States, No. 09-1349. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 4:58 pm
” This event will consider the implications of the recent Comcast v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:37 am
Condon with 437 cases 4.6% of total cases The top 10 most active panelists are all from the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
For purposes of the Graves Amendment, section 30102(a)(6) of Chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United States Code, entitled Motor Vehicle Safety, defines "motor vehicle" as "a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:31 pm
" The Court cited the 1972 United States Supreme Court case of Barker v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 9:55 am
United States, No. 09-989. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 10:03 am
Skype, Inc., et al, United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Case No. 2:09-cv-01364-RSM. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:57 am
In a rare reversal of a district court's speedy trial decision, the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
