Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,second Circuit" Results 1 - 20 of 8,934
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
” On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the decision of the District Court, concluding that “Booking.com,” taken as a whole, is not generic. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 3:39 pm by Larry
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, however, took a different approach. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 7:18 am by Randy E. Barnett
The Declaration had to be explained away–quite unconvincingly–by the Supreme Court in Dred Scott. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:48 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit allowed the lawsuit to go forward. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am by Aditi Shah
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which reversed the district court’s decision and ruled that in Thuraissigiam’s case, § 1252(e)(2) does violate the Suspension Clause. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
Citing Second Circuit precedent, Judge McMahon further held that, as landlords can still make viable use of their property by renting apartments and collecting rents, they thus could not establish a regulatory taking.Similarly, in rejecting the Contracts Clause challenge, the court concluded that landlords should have reasonably foreseen that their lease agreements could be subject to further regulatory dictates. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
Citing Second Circuit precedent, Judge McMahon further held that, as landlords can still make viable use of their property by renting apartments and collecting rents, they thus could not establish a regulatory taking.Similarly, in rejecting the Contracts Clause challenge, the court concluded that landlords should have reasonably foreseen that their lease agreements could be subject to further regulatory dictates. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
Citing Second Circuit precedent, Judge McMahon further held that, as landlords can still make viable use of their property by renting apartments and collecting rents, they thus could not establish a regulatory taking.Similarly, in rejecting the Contracts Clause challenge, the court concluded that landlords should have reasonably foreseen that their lease agreements could be subject to further regulatory dictates. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
Citing Second Circuit precedent, Judge McMahon further held that, as landlords can still make viable use of their property by renting apartments and collecting rents, they thus could not establish a regulatory taking.Similarly, in rejecting the Contracts Clause challenge, the court concluded that landlords should have reasonably foreseen that their lease agreements could be subject to further regulatory dictates. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 9:36 am by Renee Knake
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit two years later, in June 1979, thanks to one of those panels. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:48 am by Guest
Materia, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals held that 21(d) cannot be read “so as to restrict the remedies the SEC may pursue solely to injunctive relief. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 12:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The Aeron chairs were introduced in 1994 and were even more successful; by the time of trial, HM had sold 6.5 million of them in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 8:27 am by Mark MacCarthy
The second, related issue the Justice Department’s report addresses thoughtfully is whether platforms have an obligation to be fair to all political perspectives in the enforcement of their rules. [read post]