Search for: "United States Steel Corporation v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2012, 5:39 am
United States Steel Corp., et al., the plaintiffs sued U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 12:01 pm
Interplay Entertainment Corporation United States District Court, D. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:32 am
United States Steel Corporation, the Indiana Supreme Court clarified the standard of review that should apply to Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (“IURC”) interpretations of a settlement contract falling within the IURC’s regulatory authority.In 1999, the IURC issued an order approving a settlement agreement between NIPSCO and U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
Free Trade v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:10 pm
United States Steel Corporation, to be argued on Monday. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 2:58 am
Read the whole case, United States Steel v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 10:18 am
See In re United States, 669 F.3d 1333, 1336 (Fed. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:48 pm
United States Steel Corporation, counsel for both the employee-plaintiffs and the employer-defendant offered the Court tests for defining what constitutes “changing clothes,” but neither seemed to get much traction. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
NOTE: The Supreme Court case set for argument on Wednesday, Sept. 9, Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:09 pm
United States Steel Corporation involved the application of a provision added to the Act in 1949, which allows collective-bargaining agreements to exclude time spent “changing clothes” from the work time subject to the statute. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:29 pm
Supreme Court issued its much anticipated opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:30 pm
United States Steel Corp., 15 N.J. 301, 311 (1954). [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:56 am
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION;UNITED STATES STEEL AND CARNEGIE PENSION FUNDNo. 10-4475UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT2011 U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:26 am
Gulf States Reorganization Group v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 12:47 pm
Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a complaint in which the plaintiff alleged the corrugated stainless steel tubing (CSST) in his home, used to transport gas, is defective because it is vulnerable to perforation from lightning strikes. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 10:37 am
Transamerica Assurance Corporation Plaintiff v Settlement Capital Corporation Defendant-Appelant, UNted States of America Defendant-Appellee, Gary Steele Defendant United States Court of Appeals 6th Circuit, decided June 5, 2007 Download 6thCircuitDecision.pdf The Court stated that the question is whether the circumstances of this case implicate sovereign immunity under the formulations of seminal soverign… [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Sawyer[2](The Steel Seizure Case), 343 U.S. 579 (1952)· United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:21 am
/Direct Forest Products Inc., Opposition No. 91210215 [Opposition to registration of SMART CLOSET for "modular storage systems, namely, shelves units, cabinets, rails, doors, shelves, poles, clothes bars, drawers and drawer units, being installed in wardrobes or any other room of a house, office or garage," on the ground of lack of bona fide intent to use the mark in commerce].February 23, 2016 - 2 PM: In re Fullscreen, Inc., Serial No. 85951468 and 85951513 [Refusal to… [read post]
