Search for: "United States Steel Corporation v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 296
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2021, 4:17 am
” In Frank v D’Ambrosi, 4 F.3d 1378 [6th Cir. 1993], the plaintiff and defendant were 50/50 shareholders and co-directors in an Ohio steel processing company which was dissolved on consent in 1989 after the defendant, D’Ambrosi, sued for judicial dissolution. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 11:20 am
United States. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm
Elgizouli v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] 2 WLR 857 The case concerns the UK’s stance on the application of mutual legal assistance to the United States where doing so may result in the death penalty being carried out. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The SCM Agreement and its predecessor, the Tokyo Subsidies Code were heavily influenced by the United States practice. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:55 am
The corporate tax rate was lowered from 57 to 30 percent (while the corporate tax base was broadened), and capital income—interest, dividends, and capital gains—were taxed at a uniform rate of 30 percent.[6] In addition, during the last 30 years, Sweden has abolished or reformed several other taxes to encourage economic growth, including the abolition of the inheritance tax in 2004, the entrepreneurial tax in 2005, and the wealth tax in 2007.[7] Note that these changes… [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:59 am
Kaiser Steel Corp v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:59 am
Kaiser Steel Corp v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
United Steel Workers, 2019 BCSC 2216. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation.[5] The plaintiff had characterized the case as a consumer case, with the duty to warn him as the ultimate user. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:35 pm
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm
Illinois State LawContract InterpretationFour Corners RuleParol Evidence RuleComparing the Subject Matter of ContractsAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 1:16-cv-03545Molon Motor and Coil Corporation (“Molon”) appeals from the judgment of the U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
Although the Trump Administration recently announced its withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, United States lawmakers took note of the report. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:34 am
Alstate Steel, Inc. is the only time the doctrine has been addressed in a New Mexico state court opinion. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am
“Beginning a dialogue” is the corporate equivalent of a punt. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am
“Beginning a dialogue” is the corporate equivalent of a punt. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Twitter’s policy states that users “may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people” and the social network prohibits “the glorification of violence. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 1:29 pm
Holly Hill Fruit Prods., 75 F.2d 13, 15 (5th Cir. 1935); see United Drug Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 5:11 pm
One of the most interesting and significant developments in the corporate and securities litigation arena has been the rise of collective investor litigation outside the United States, as I have discussed in prior posts. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am
Dagenhart and United States v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:00 am
It also had six business units located in the state. [read post]
