Search for: "United States Testing Company, Inc., Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
Clayton County, GA (No. 17-1618) and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
Kreisberg 14-93Issue: (1) Whether a companion authorization issued by the general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board in conjunction with an order from the board itself, purporting to possess a quorum and take the same action on its own behalf, suffices to authorize a Section 10(j) proceeding commenced while the board itself lacked a quorum to authorize it; and (2) whether the familiar four-factor test for preliminary… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
Petitioner’s reply Title: Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christa Culver
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative LawSource: Justia October 28, 2011 Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
In 1991 they entered the United States on visitor visas and, after they overstayed their visas and the Immigration and Nationalization Service issued orders to show cause why they should not be deported, Arturas applied for asylum. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Companies responding to Staff investigations may also experience accelerated timelines and less flexibility in responding to subpoenas and information requests. [read post]