Search for: "United States ex rel. Toth v. Quarles" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2012, 1:19 am by Mike Hanzel
LTC Kageleiry asked the Court to apply the “Toth Doctrine” (United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:24 pm
Even if not, Article 3(a) would provide a clear statutory basis for jurisdiction, though United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm by Tom Goldstein
United States (decided five to four); United States ex rel. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:00 am by Peter Margulies
  Justice Stevens recognized, as the Court had indicated in the 1955 case of United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 6:07 am
But the Patriot Act amended the SMTJ statute to make clear that it covers overseas bases, at least "with respect to offenses committed by or against a national of the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
There is a rather fey textual argument I have heard that runs like this: Of course you can disqualify someone who is not a civil officer of the United States. [read post]