Search for: "United States v. Hubbell" Results 1 - 20 of 102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
”  If the Secretary believes Section 11(c)(1) was violated, “[the Secretary] shall bring an action in any appropriate United States district court against such person. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am by centerforartlaw
If you put the term in the Martindale-Hubbell directory, no names would appear. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 2:53 pm by lennyesq
The order is here: Order and Memorandum Opinion –United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:11 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
IDR Process Suspended The IDR process currently is suspended following the August 3 , 2023 ruling by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Texas Medical Association v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While courts generally recognize and enforce contractual agreements by a party to consent to jurisdiction, mere registration of an out-of-state business to do business in a state historically has not been recognized as creating the necessary “substantial minimum contacts” that the Due Process clause of the United States Constitution generally requires exist to provide the general personal jurisdiction that must exist for a state court to… [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am by Greg Reed
He is Board Certified in Personal Injury Trial Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and AV rated by Martindale-Hubbell. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 5:09 pm by Levin Papantonio
I am elated that the 3rd Circuit sided on behalf of the thousands of ovarian cancer victims, each of whom are entitled to their day in court by the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 6:12 pm by Levin Papantonio
That motion was initially denied, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is set to take up the matter on appeal on September 19, 2022.Talc Powder Has Cost J&J Billions of DollarsThe pharmaceutical giant is promoting the decision as “part of a worldwide portfolio assessment. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 12:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Transgender Employment Discrimination Risks Rising In 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 6:40 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Assuming the Administration follows appropriate procedures to adopt the rules, most legal commentators do not expect the legal challenges opposing the mandate orders to be successful in the courts particularly after the Supreme Court refused to overturn or hear arguments for overturning a unanimous decision of a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Klassen v. [read post]