Search for: "United States v. Realty Co" Results 61 - 80 of 177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2014, 5:17 am
30 May 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
It's that time again... time to check in on the week's news in Suits by Suits: The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued its opinion in Velazquez-Perez v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
  A “home” can be a single family dwelling, a 2-4 family home, a manufactured home, a condo unit,  or a residential coop unit. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 1:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Gertler, M.D., P.C. v Sol Masch & Co., 40 AD3d 282, 283 [1st Dept 2007]; Alpert v Shea Gould Climenko & Casey, 160 AD2d 67, 71-72 [1st Dept 1990]; see also Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney, 88 NY2d 413, 422-423 [1996]). [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(Shkolnik v Krutoy, 32 AD3d 536, 537 [2006], quoting 5303 Realty Corp. v O & Y Equity Corp., 64 NY2d 313, 315-316, 321 [1984]). [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:57 am by Carolyn E. Wright
A different case on the other side of the United States. . . [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:57 am by Carolyn E. Wright
A different case on the other side of the United States. . . [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 11:11 am by Sherwin Root
  HUD was further not entitled to a lesser degree of deference owed to an agency position, “in proportion to its persuasiveness” as set forth in the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Skidmore v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
Last month the United States tax court issues a decision in a case which caught the eye of many involved in estate planning matters. [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm by Law Lady
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.Contempt -- Where court had entered order requiring co-owner of condominium apartment to “vacate” the unit because her occupancy violated the fifty-five and older age restriction for residents, it was error to hold the co-owner in contempt for continuing to spend several hours a day at the unit for the purpose of remodeling and gardening and staying overnight on several occasions -- Court order was… [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 6:53 am by Scott Riddle
Realty Savings & Trust Co., 167 Ga. 170 (1928), much like an owner after a tax sale… If Scorpion were a debtor, Section 541(d) provides that the Property itself would not be property of Scorpion’s estate. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Co., 196 S.W.3d 774, 780-81 (Tex. 2006) (orig. proceeding); see also Austin Commercial Contractors, L.P. v. [read post]