Search for: "United States v. Realty Co" Results 81 - 100 of 177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Co., 196 S.W.3d 774, 780-81 (Tex. 2006) (orig. proceeding); see also Austin Commercial Contractors, L.P. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Liebman, Adolf & Charme, 257 AD2d 424; VDR Realty Corp. v Mintz, 167 AD2d 986; Wolstencroft v Sassower, 124 AD2d at 582; see also DePinto v Rosenthal & Curry, 237 AD2d 482, 482)".   [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:35 pm by Juan Antunez
Walls, 810 So.2d at 572 (finding a co-op to be subject to the exemption from forced sale because “a co-op owner owns the unit, pays valuable consideration for it, and has the right to the exclusive use and possession of it for the duration of the lease”). [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:43 pm
In the United States, several states began to fear losing investments to offshore jurisdictions. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
(See Mehraban v McIntosh, 2011 WL 486101, p.3 [Sup St, Nassau Co., 2011]). [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:21 am by Joel R. Brandes
Tov-Le Realty Corp. (220 A.D.2d 552, 553) may suggest a different conclusion, it is not to be followed.” [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Instead, he agrees with the logic and methodology approved in Matter of Murphy (United States Dredging Corp.), 74 AD3d 815 (2d Dept 2010) (read here my post on Murphy), requiring a present value computation of the gains taxes to be paid at a projected future date, here, at the end of the assumed 10-year holding period.  [read post]