Search for: "United States v. Realty Co" Results 81 - 100 of 180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2013, 11:11 am by Sherwin Root
  HUD was further not entitled to a lesser degree of deference owed to an agency position, “in proportion to its persuasiveness” as set forth in the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Skidmore v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
Last month the United States tax court issues a decision in a case which caught the eye of many involved in estate planning matters. [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm by Law Lady
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.Contempt -- Where court had entered order requiring co-owner of condominium apartment to “vacate” the unit because her occupancy violated the fifty-five and older age restriction for residents, it was error to hold the co-owner in contempt for continuing to spend several hours a day at the unit for the purpose of remodeling and gardening and staying overnight on several occasions -- Court order was… [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 6:53 am by Scott Riddle
Realty Savings & Trust Co., 167 Ga. 170 (1928), much like an owner after a tax sale… If Scorpion were a debtor, Section 541(d) provides that the Property itself would not be property of Scorpion’s estate. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Co., 196 S.W.3d 774, 780-81 (Tex. 2006) (orig. proceeding); see also Austin Commercial Contractors, L.P. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Co., 196 S.W.3d 774, 780-81 (Tex. 2006) (orig. proceeding); see also Austin Commercial Contractors, L.P. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:35 pm by Juan Antunez
Walls, 810 So.2d at 572 (finding a co-op to be subject to the exemption from forced sale because “a co-op owner owns the unit, pays valuable consideration for it, and has the right to the exclusive use and possession of it for the duration of the lease”). [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:43 pm
In the United States, several states began to fear losing investments to offshore jurisdictions. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
(See Mehraban v McIntosh, 2011 WL 486101, p.3 [Sup St, Nassau Co., 2011]). [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:21 am by Joel R. Brandes
Tov-Le Realty Corp. (220 A.D.2d 552, 553) may suggest a different conclusion, it is not to be followed.” [read post]