Search for: "United States v. Realty Co." Results 81 - 100 of 226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38; see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State Street Bank and Trust Co., 5 NY3d 582, 591; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38; see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State Street Bank and Trust Co., 5 NY3d 582, 591; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Liebman, Adolf & Charme, 257 AD2d 424; VDR Realty Corp. v Mintz, 167 AD2d 986; Wolstencroft v Sassower, 124 AD2d at 582; see also DePinto v Rosenthal & Curry, 237 AD2d 482, 482)". [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:11 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Wiretap Applications Did Not Need to Allege Probable Cause That Controlled Substance Was in Khat Leaves United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
In other words, compared to the operational mayhem and business impairment often caused by warring co-owners of a sales or service business, the realty firm’s purpose and finances tend to remain intact, making it harder to satisfy the dissolution standard for LLCs. [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:23 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticePrior Shoplifting Offenses Not ‘Similar' to Passing Bad Check; No Error in Criminal History Computation United States, appellee v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
Gruizinga contracted with Parkland Realty to market the units. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:57 am by Carolyn E. Wright
A different case on the other side of the United States. . . [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm by Law Lady
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.Contempt -- Where court had entered order requiring co-owner of condominium apartment to “vacate” the unit because her occupancy violated the fifty-five and older age restriction for residents, it was error to hold the co-owner in contempt for continuing to spend several hours a day at the unit for the purpose of remodeling and gardening and staying overnight on several occasions -- Court order was… [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 1:54 am
NYS Division of Housing & Community Renewal NEW YORK COUNTYContractsTriable Issues on Co-op's Attempts at Curing Problems in Unit Preclude Summary JudgmentLoss v. 407-413 Owners Corp.BRONX COUNTYDamagesCourt Rules Equity Required Permitting Evidence of Machine's Malfunction at TrialCarmona v. [read post]