Search for: "United States v. 20 CASES, ETC." Results 1 - 20 of 623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Upon entry into force of this Treaty, the Extradition Treaty between the United States and Great Britain signed at London, December 22, 1931, will cease to have effect, with certain exceptions, between the United States and Malaysia. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This meant, in practice, that in seeking fugitives from the United Kingdom, the United States had to present a prima facie case, a requirement that often proved to be burdensome. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ford, President of the United States of America, proclaim and make public the Treaty, Protocol of Signature, and the exchange of notes, to the end that they shall be observed and fulfilled with good faith on and after January 21, 1977, by the United States of America and by the citizens of the United States of America and all other persons subject to the jurisdiction thereof. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:36 pm by Christine Hurt
Final note:  This case was argued for the United States by Michael R. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Chinmayi Sharma
Four years later, in November 2017, the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (2014) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (2015). [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  These cases arise from the April 20, 2010 explosion, fire, and sinking of the DEEPWATER HORIZON mobile offshore drilling unit…, which resulted in the release of millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico before it was finally capped approximately three months later. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:10 pm by Phil Cave
in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
  The California Supreme Court doesn't feel that issue's sufficiently important to grant review.But the United States Supreme Court does. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
On February 15, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, issued Insurance Co. of the Sate of Pa ["Vickers"] v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
§ 23.5     Damages In Cases Involving Death of Spouse or Parent The Case: Jordan v. [read post]