Search for: "United States v. 50 Acres of Land" Results 21 - 40 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 12:42 pm by GreenbergTraurig
In the meantime, the regulated community must make sense of this complex rulemaking, estimated by some to affect as much as 60 percent of the land in the United States. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:19 am by Joe Koncelik
 The Takings Clause of Article V of the United States Constitution states that “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 10:00 am
The land in question is located in Michigan, and consists of 50 acres, and only 2.2 acres of this parcel is considered to be wetlands. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am by Arthur F. Coon
It relied on the CEQA Guidelines’ Class 3 exemption for “new, small facilities or structures” including “[o]ne single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone” (14 Cal. [read post]