Search for: "United States v. 50 Acres of Land" Results 41 - 60 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2010, 8:13 pm by Keith Rizzardi
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is the federal agency charged with overseeing livestock grazing on over 160 million acres of public land in the western United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The Center proposed to demolish its existing 13,745 square foot single story building with a 68,206 square foot mixed use five story project, including 50 residential units. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm by Matthew Ackerman
”  United States v. 2.33 Acres of Land, 704 F.2d 728, 730 (4th Cir. 1983). [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 11:00 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  The project would include an 85-acre resort parcel, with up to 850 lodging units, 300,000 square feet of commercial space, and over 3,000 parking spaces, and an 8.8-acre parcel housing 300 resort employees, to be constructed over 25 years. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 4:55 pm
EXCERPT: The Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) is a critical national security concept to provide an effective defense for the United States, and Vandenberg Air Force Base states that the Conventional Strike Missile program has been planned for a location in the vicinity of proposed La Graciosa Thistle critical habitat. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
The rodeo activity contemplated 1500 attendees, 500 horses (maximum of 100 onsite at any time) and 250 cattle/stock (maximum 50 onsite at any time.) [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:11 pm
As an aside, United States v. 4.0 Acres of Land was an Arizona case, where the U.S. government condemned land to build a federal courthouse. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:10 pm
Interior Secretary to approve the Narragansett Indian Tribe’s request to have a 31-acre parcel of land it owns in the town of Charlestown, R.I., placed in trust for the tribe. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
No dice, held the court of appeals, in Lucas, "the United States Supreme Court held that in a takings case, where the property owner challenges a regulation as denying all economically beneficial or productive use of land, the regulatory action is 'compensable without a case-specific inquiry into the public interest advanced in support of the restraint.'" Slip op. at 9 (quoting Lucas v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 4:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Such projects contain at least 50% residential use, have a minimum density of 20 units per acre, and are located with one-half mile of a major transit stop or transit corridor. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:50 am by Evan George
Named plaintiff Rikki Held (and the only one who was 18 years old when the suit was filed) lives with her family on a 7,000-acre ranch where they depend on water rights to a river that has dried up and land that’s been scorched by wildfires. [read post]