Search for: "United States v. 89 Firearms" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2021, 8:51 am by Shawn Dominy
  However, as a criminal defense lawyer, I have been asked about Qualified Immunity due to recent events in the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:59 am by Margaret Wood
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), Justice Scalia applied the rule first formulated in Katz v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
And the United States Supreme Court and courts of other states have treated the right as extending beyond firearms. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
The University of Michigan moves to dismiss this claim, arguing that, as a Michigan state department, it is entitled to immunity from suit under the 11th Amendment.The 11th Amendment provides, in relevant part: `The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State[.] [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:00 am by Jeffrey M. Hanna
Va. 2011).2For a discussion of these standards, see id. at 487-89; see also United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 4:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) From State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm by Brian Shiffrin
United States, 395 U.S. 6, 33, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 1546, 23 L.Ed.2d 57;  Tot v. [read post]