Search for: "United States v. 89 Firearms"
Results 21 - 40
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2014, 1:55 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:00 am
Va. 2011).2For a discussion of these standards, see id. at 487-89; see also United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 4:55 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm
United States, 395 U.S. 6, 33, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 1546, 23 L.Ed.2d 57; Tot v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
Procedural History Petitioner is charged via information with 17 counts of sexual battery with a firearm, 3 counts of robbery with a firearm, and 4 counts of false imprisonment. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
” The court follows Fourth Circuit precedent (United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
As used in this paragraph, "laser sighting system or device" means any system or device that is integrated with or affixed to a firearm and emits a laser light beam that is used to assist in the sight alignment or aiming of the firearm. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm
Young v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:15 am
– In United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 2:49 pm
United States, decided today. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 08-1569 Title: United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
United States Issue: Does 21 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 6:23 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:57 pm
" United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 3:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 5:45 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 5:53 am
Strope, 25 F.3d 647, 650, 653 (8th Cir. 1994) (how best to proceed in performing search is generally left to discretion of officers executing warrant, but even valid warrants must be executed in reasonable manner); United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:22 pm
For all things "DC v. [read post]
