Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc" Results 81 - 100 of 5,802
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2010, 11:25 pm
New York’s Administrative Procedures Act does not require a State agency to issue a declaratory ruling when requestedMatter of Humane Society of United States, Inc. v Brennan, 63 AD3d 1419The genesis of this lawsuit was the New York State’s Department of Agriculture and Markets' declining to issue a declaration that foie gras* is an adulterated food product within the meaning of Agriculture and Markets Law §200. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Tejinder Singh
  The Act requires states to “accept and use” a specific federal form for voter registration; that form asks, among other things, whether the would-be voter is a citizen of the United States and over the age of eighteen. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
May 20, 2008) In Fiddler, the defendants, AT&T Mobility, M-Qube, Inc. and Verisign, Inc., were sued in Illinois state court for allegedly making unauthorized charges for mobile telephone services. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 4:30 am
 The original complaint alleged Illinois state law causes of action and defined the proposed class as “all persons in the United States who purchased Hasbro Inc. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:45 am by Gene Quinn
Recently, in a non-precedential decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit remanded Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:18 am by PaulKostro
Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, CAMDEN VICINAGE, December 20, 2011: In United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:19 pm by Stone Law, P.C.
On November 13, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) requested the U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
And it went on to explain that [t]o that end, the United States Supreme Court has considered the type of speech at issue when determining the appropriate standards to apply in defamation cases. [read post]