Search for: "United States v. Abbott Laboratories"
Results 21 - 40
of 151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2019, 5:30 am
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 11:00 pm
The underlying suit was based on Abbott's belief that the defendants were importing, advertising, and subsequently distributing boxes of Abbott's international test strips in the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 5:31 am
Mazzo executed a nondisclosure agreement with Abbott Laboratories, Inc. while that firm was exploring its acquisition of AMO. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
As is well known, pre-enforcement review of rules was not recognized as an option in other APA proceedings until 1967, when the Supreme Court decided Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
" United Nuclear Corp v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:34 am
Abbott Laboratories, 26 Cal.3d at p. 611.) [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 5:59 am
Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie Inc. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 5:47 pm
"from FTC v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 8:36 am
ABBOTT LABORATORIES – United States District Court – Eastern District of new York – May 22nd, 2017) involves the drug Depakote. [read post]
24 May 2017, 8:36 am
ABBOTT LABORATORIES – United States District Court – Eastern District of new York – May 22nd, 2017) involves the drug Depakote. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:54 am
Abbott Laboratories Inc. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:48 am
On one hand, United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Sanofi-Aventis United States LLP, 806 F.3d 71 (2d Cir. 2015). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
If the Canadian patent office requires that a divisional application be filed pursuant to Section 36(2.1) of the Patent Act, a court has held that it would “be unfair and inequitable” (see Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Forest Laboratories, a case from the Lexapro MDL, the court agreed with defendant’s argument that per Bartlett, the United States Supreme Court has held that design defect claims involving pharmaceutical products are preempted. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 12:06 pm
United States , 213F.3d 1366, 1370 (Fed. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 6:40 am
Abbott Laboratories, 740 F.3d 471 (9th Cir. 2014). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 2:30 pm
United States, No. 14-233C (2014) involved a Defense Health Agency procurement for self-monitoring blood glucose strips. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
