Search for: "United States v. Abbott Laboratories"
Results 41 - 60
of 154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2015, 12:06 pm
United States , 213F.3d 1366, 1370 (Fed. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 5:47 pm
"from FTC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 4:30 am
Abbott Laboratories, 2013 U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 4:17 pm
We need to know exactly who in the company was aware of this failure and the alleged attempts to hide this information from the FDA,” DeLauro said during a meeting on the Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Request for the United States Department of Agriculture. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:47 am
Abbott Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:20 pm
(now known as Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.) and Abbott Laboratories (collectively, Abbott).Therasense at *2. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Procedural HistoryThe New Drug Application (NDA) for the Tarka® product was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1996 and acquired by Abbott Laboratories in 2001. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:21 pm
Abbott Laboratories, 2012 U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 7:01 pm
Abbott Labs., 512 F.3d 1363, 1378 (Fed. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 6:00 pm
As the author points out, nobody in the United States has bought into this theory so far. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Forest Laboratories, a case from the Lexapro MDL, the court agreed with defendant’s argument that per Bartlett, the United States Supreme Court has held that design defect claims involving pharmaceutical products are preempted. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:28 pm
In reaching that result, the panel applied a “heightened scrutiny” analysis, saying that was now necessary after the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
Abbott Laboratories has drawn praise for developing a relatively reliable, fast diagnostic test for COVID-19, but (at least as of mid-April 2020) its manufacturing capacity has been unable to keep up with demand. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 7:08 am
The fallout from the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:17 am
Abbott Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:48 am
On one hand, United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The SmithKline panel instead decided that Witt’s rational-basis-review approach is inconsistent with—and thus no longer binding because of—the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
Kappos) Last week the Federal Circuit heard oral argument (here) in Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 10:33 am
At the DIDA site, under Document Sources, you can read about some of those drug company lawsuits, in particular: United States of America ex rel. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:02 pm
Abbott Laboratories Inc. [read post]
