Search for: "United States v. Abbott Laboratories" Results 41 - 60 of 150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
  Procedural HistoryThe New Drug Application (NDA) for the Tarka® product was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1996 and acquired by Abbott Laboratories in 2001. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In reaching that result, the panel applied a “heightened scrutiny” analysis, saying that was now necessary after the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 6:22 am by Legal Reader
Kelly, Sr., : COMPLAINT AND DEMAND: FOR JURY TRIALPlaintiff, ::v. :: Case No. 1:14-cv-879AbbVie Inc., and :Abbott Laboratories, Inc., ::Defendants. [read post]
The SmithKline panel instead decided that Witt’s rational-basis-review approach is inconsistent with—and thus no longer binding because of—the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:50 am by Cicely Wilson
The court held that classifications based on sexual orientation were subject to a heightened scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:27 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Abbott Laboratories, 201 F.3d 883 (7th Cir. 2000), didn’t apply because the survey wasn’t being used to define the meaning of that phrase. [read post]