Search for: "United States v. Abed" Results 1 - 20 of 572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2020, 9:01 am by HRWatchdog
Legal documents in Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:45 pm by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
As a result of AB 60 legislation, the Department of Motor Vehicles began issuing driver’s licenses in January of this year to persons who are unable to submit satisfactory proof of legal presence in the United States. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:47 am by Natalma M. McKnew
AB-5 codifies the Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:49 pm by Michael Weil
  While some groups had early success, United States District Court Judge Dolly Gee denied a request by Uber and Postmates to preliminarily enjoin enforcement of AB 5 against them while their constitutional challenge to the law plays out, in Olson, et al. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
In 1995, the United States launched the first NAFTA trade challenge.[9] It was the first and only NAFTA Chapter 20 Canada-U.S. dispute as the agreement’s state-to-state provisions fell into disuse. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:00 am by Jorge Miranda
Walker, Jr., The Role of Precedents in the United States: How Do Precedents Lose Their Binding Effect? [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm by John Floyd
”   The Second Circuit Court of Appeals tackled this novel question in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 4:15 am by IPWatchdog
On January 7, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) dismissed ABS Global's appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) as moot. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am by Gene Takagi
AB 5 modifies how workers are classified as employees or independent contractors for state law purposes and codifies the 2018 California Supreme Court decision known as Dynamex. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:30 am by Beth Graham
Although AB 51 was originally set to take effect on January 1st, Chief United States District Judge Kimberly Mueller issued a temporary restraining order barring its enforcement in late 2019. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:15 am
The decision, Chamber of Commerce of the United States et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:48 pm by Greg Mersol
(Oct. 11, Dec. 30 and Jan. 16) Much of that saga currently focuses on the case of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]