Search for: "United States v. Adcock"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2007, 2:34 pm
When United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 8:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 12:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:54 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:43 am
United States before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:46 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 5:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 4:50 pm
Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN NOT CONSIDERING THIS COURT'S DECISION IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 4:30 am
In a recent opinion, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 9:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 6:15 am
See Adcock v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:58 am
Byrd Center for Legislative StudiesMicki Kaufman, CUNY Graduate Center, “Everything on Paper Will Be Used Against Me: Quantifying Kissinger”Billy Wayson, “Making Sense of Digital Information Using Qualitative Analysis SoftwareTom Faith, Office of the Historian, Department of State, “Mapping the Foreign Relations of the United States Series”James Wyatt, Robert C. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
RICKY ADCOCK, No. 11-0934 Opinion of the Court Dissenting The Court holds that a rule issued by a state agency cannot create a procedure to allow decisions about permanent lifetime workers-compensation benefits to be reopened — “a procedure the Legislature deliberately removed in 1989. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:05 pm
The other, published in 2008, is Rebecca Ordish and Alan Adcock's China Intellectual Property Challenges and Solutions (Wiley, details here). [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Walton, Judge, The United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaClosing remarks4:15-4:30 p.m. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Milwaukeeans had to wait until December 12 to learn that the United States Supreme Court had denied the state’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
