Search for: "United States v. Ahmad" Results 41 - 60 of 115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2024, 7:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
The importance of this initial consideration was recently reinforced in an August 2024 decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Continental Casualty Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
United States v Meng, 2020 BCSC 785 [82] Ms. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 7:03 pm
Magistrate Judges cannot issue final orders on foreign intelligence matters “binding on all courts of the United States” as contemplated by FISA. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 3:39 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Elspeth Berry, The Zone of Interaction Between Partnerships, LLPs and Human Rights in United Kingdom LawSandy Ghandhi, Human Rights and the International Court of Justice The Ahmadou Sadio Diallo CaseElizabeth Wicks, A, B, C v Ireland: Abortion Law under the European Convention on Human RightsStephen Skinner, The Right to Life, Democracy and State Responsibility in ‘Urban Guerilla’ Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber Judgment in… [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:33 am
Although the Supreme Court rejected the habeas-stripping provisions as unconstitutional in Boumediene v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 2:59 pm by Nikki Siesel
On April 20, 2006 the Applicant filed a trademark application for NATIONSTAR pro se with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Johnson, Counter-Narrative in Corporate Law: Saints and Sinners, Apostles and Epistles, (Michigan State Law Review, Forthcoming).Dana Brakman Reiser, Charity Law's Essentials, (Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 167, Sept. 28, 2009).From SmartCILP and elsewhere:Nehaluddin Ahmad, The Modern Concept of Secularism and Islamic Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis, 15 Annual Survey Of International & Comparative Law 75-105 (2009).Paul Horwitz, Demographics and… [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:35 am by Howard Friedman
Tax Law Affect the Foundations Regime in the United Arab Emirates', (Tax Notes International Vol. 98 No. 5 May 4, 2020).Shahbaz Ahmad Cheema, Inheritance of Full Sister/s with Consanguine Brother/s in Pakistan: A Critical Analysis of Saadullah v Gulbanda, (May 21, 2020).Bernard Adaafu Okpi, How to Divorce: A Legal Digest, (May 21, 2020).From SmartCILP:Peter Manus, Justice Gorsuch's Crusade: The Inviolable Power of Religion, [Abstract], 28 Boston… [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The defendants taken into custody today are expected to make their initial appearances before United States Magistrate Judge William V. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The defendants taken into custody today are expected to make their initial appearances before United States Magistrate Judge William V. [read post]
” Lord Reed noted dicta in Ahmad v United Kingdom (App nos. 24027/07, 11949/08, 36742/08, 66911/09 & 67354/09) to the effect that segregation for security, disciplinary or protection reasons does not per se violate Article 3. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by Hanibal Goitom
Dodd-Frank Act, despite coming under frequent criticism for its lack of action by the United Nations. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by Hanibal Goitom
Dodd-Frank Act, despite coming under frequent criticism for its lack of action by the United Nations. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am by centerforartlaw
”[11] In 1813, the American vessel, Marquis de Somerueles, was carrying cargo from the Italian Academy of Arts when it was captured by the British.[12] The United States successfully petitioned the Admiralty Court of Halifax to have the cargo be returned to the United States.[13] The Court held that the arts and sciences are entitled to protection as “an exception to the severe rights of warfare. [read post]