Search for: "United States v. Alaska" Results 221 - 240 of 836
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2011, 6:53 am by Viking
Politico is reporting:  That 15 personnel were “disciplined” as a result of United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:57 pm by Native American Rights Fund
City of El Paso (Tribal Real Property) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlMitchell v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:57 pm by Unknown
City of El Paso (Tribal Real Property) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlMitchell v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:08 pm by Unknown
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act)The Shawnee Tribe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 11:10 am by Kate Fort
Alaska Natives know that the Alaska Native villages are tribal governments; state chartered Alaska Native corporations (“ANCs”) are not. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 3:16 pm by Native American Rights Fund
S.Res.577: A resolution commemorating the 50th anniversary of the Alaska Federation of Natives. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 1:28 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Federal Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2017.htmlMassachusetts v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:50 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States 19-107Issue: Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendments prohibit a federal court from basing a criminal defendant’s sentence on conduct underlying a charge of which the defendant was acquitted by a jury. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:01 am
 Judge Kozinski instead articulates hyperbolic, Scalia-like claims, including an allegation that the United States has become "more an oligarchy governed by a cadre of black-robed mandarins" and his alleged "worry about the future of the Republic" from cases like this one.All of this in a dissent that's a single paragraph.My view is that the overwrought claims here do a disservice to their authors and to the judiciary as well. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation)Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]