Search for: "United States v. Alaska" Results 321 - 340 of 1,131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 11:10 am by Kate Fort
Alaska Natives know that the Alaska Native villages are tribal governments; state chartered Alaska Native corporations (“ANCs”) are not. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm by NARF
(Joinder; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:53 am by Viking
Politico is reporting:  That 15 personnel were “disciplined” as a result of United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:57 pm by Native American Rights Fund
City of El Paso (Tribal Real Property) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlMitchell v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:57 pm by Unknown
City of El Paso (Tribal Real Property) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlMitchell v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:08 pm by Unknown
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act)The Shawnee Tribe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Oklahoma; Post-Conviction Relief; Section 14 of the Curtis Act) United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 12:41 pm by NARF
(Tribal Court Jurisdiction; Indian Child Welfare Act) United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:50 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States 19-107Issue: Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendments prohibit a federal court from basing a criminal defendant’s sentence on conduct underlying a charge of which the defendant was acquitted by a jury. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:55 am by Jeremy Feigenbaum
Although the challengers in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 3:16 pm by Native American Rights Fund
S.Res.577: A resolution commemorating the 50th anniversary of the Alaska Federation of Natives. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 1:28 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Federal Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2017.htmlMassachusetts v. [read post]