Search for: "United States v. All That Tract & Parcel of Land" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On March 22, 2017, we blogged about the importance of the United States Supreme Court’s looming decision in Murr v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:51 am by Ilya Somin
” Roberts argues – correctly, in my view – that it would be better to adopt a presumption in favor of treating each parcel separately: State laws define the boundaries of distinct units of land, and those boundaries should, in all but the most exceptional circumstances, determine the parcel at issue. [read post]
5 May 2014, 3:14 pm by Jordan Pascale, P.L.
DOT and TIIFT asserted that the rightof- way reservation applied to all tracts of land and was not limited by the beginning qualifying language. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:07 pm
The MDP prepared for the Business Park stated its intention of being the primary land use document that establishes the course of development for a flexible planned mixed use project. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
No dice, held the court of appeals, in Lucas, "the United States Supreme Court held that in a takings case, where the property owner challenges a regulation as denying all economically beneficial or productive use of land, the regulatory action is 'compensable without a case-specific inquiry into the public interest advanced in support of the restraint.'" Slip op. at 9 (quoting Lucas v. [read post]