Search for: "United States v. All That Tract & Parcel of Land"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2017, 9:11 am
On March 22, 2017, we blogged about the importance of the United States Supreme Court’s looming decision in Murr v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:15 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court in Murr v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 2:31 pm
Adams v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm
United States, Steven L. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
In Murr v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
In Murr v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 2:19 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 2:19 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
” Roberts argues – correctly, in my view – that it would be better to adopt a presumption in favor of treating each parcel separately: State laws define the boundaries of distinct units of land, and those boundaries should, in all but the most exceptional circumstances, determine the parcel at issue. [read post]
5 May 2014, 3:14 pm
DOT and TIIFT asserted that the rightof- way reservation applied to all tracts of land and was not limited by the beginning qualifying language. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 10:32 am
Lands Commission v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:07 pm
The MDP prepared for the Business Park stated its intention of being the primary land use document that establishes the course of development for a flexible planned mixed use project. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:31 pm
The parties in Murr v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 12:44 pm
United States, No 04-41196 (5th Cir., Oct. 11, 2006). [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm
No dice, held the court of appeals, in Lucas, "the United States Supreme Court held that in a takings case, where the property owner challenges a regulation as denying all economically beneficial or productive use of land, the regulatory action is 'compensable without a case-specific inquiry into the public interest advanced in support of the restraint.'" Slip op. at 9 (quoting Lucas v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
In United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
