Search for: "United States v. Alston"
Results 1 - 20
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2023, 5:30 am
For the past few years, I have watched with some apprehension the explosion of legalized gambling in the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm
In Reilly, another judge relied on Epic, and one of the very best litigators in the entire United States--Mark Perry--squared off with a "no name" attorney. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:57 am
When we asked it to name three noteworthy opinions of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Question #11), it started off strong: It identified (and correctly summarized) her majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 7:47 am
Ericsson evidentiary hearing (a trial by any other name) in the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) (Presiding Judge: Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Monica Bhattacharyya.Here are the minutes of the final trial day in Texas, which was rather short owing to the settlement:Ericsson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 11:40 pm
I remember her as a witness who came across as trustworthy, knowledgeable, and fairly balanced in the FTC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:20 am
In 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States released its opinion in the case National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 11:34 am
It's no longer a secret to which three judges the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has assigned the Epic Games v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 9:55 am
All of them supported UEFA against the "Super League" and stated their policy reasons. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 5:22 am
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California made it sound in her judgment as if Epic could only have debunked Apple's security pretext if it had proved the complete uselessness of human app review. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:18 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 2:17 pm
Alston marked a major shift in the way collegiate sports operate in the United States, the full ramifications of... [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:12 am
In Hamdan v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 9:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am
Ellen Staurowsky: To start with, we’ve got the compensation issues, which have been the subject of a number of antitrust lawsuits going from O’Bannon to Alston onto House. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
Alston, the Court rejected the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s argument that it should have benefited from a “quick look”, restating that “most restraints challenged under the Sherman Act” are subject to the rule of reason.[26] The message from the Court is clear: rules are the exception, not the norm. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
Qualified Immunity: Federal law provides a cause of action for individuals who have been “depriv[ed] of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws” of the United States by a person acting under the color of law. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm
The states make fairly similar arguments (interestingly also citing to NCAA v Alston a few times), but that's still helpful.A submission by Microsoft is perfectly complementary to the other filings because it shows that even another "Big Tech" company is profoundly concerned over, and negatively impacted by, Apple's conduct--and because of the arguments Microsoft's very well-crafted brief makes (this post continues below the document)22-01-27… [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 6:10 am
A potential class of more than 170,000 former students that received financial aid to attend 16 of the top universities in the United States may be entitled to hundreds of millions of dollars in damages, according to a complaint recently filed in the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 6:10 am
A potential class of more than 170,000 former students that received financial aid to attend 16 of the top universities in the United States may be entitled to hundreds of millions of dollars in damages, according to a complaint recently filed in the U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 9:50 am
In United States v Jindal, (ED Tex. [read post]
