Search for: "United States v. American Oil Company"
Results 181 - 200
of 500
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2015, 2:59 am
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
Legalistic Lawlessness and the Strategic Use of Repudiated Supreme Court Precedents, Part One of Two
31 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
(This generation’s Korematsu, 2018’s Trump v. [read post]
Legalistic Lawlessness and the Strategic Use of Repudiated Supreme Court Precedents, Part One of Two
31 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
(This generation’s Korematsu, 2018’s Trump v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 3:22 pm
Sinochem, a Chinese company, contracted with Triorient, an American company which is not a party to the case, for sale of the coils. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:01 pm
Venezuela-related Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs 1098 and 1099).It was reported that "Chevron Corp on Saturday received a U.S. license allowing the second-largest U.S. oil company to expand its production in Venezuela and bring the South American country's crude oil to the United States. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am
They could not remove speech glorifying terrorist attacks against the United States—unless they also remove speech decrying, memorializing, or educating about terrorist attacks against the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am
(The defendants were a British oil company, a Dutch oil company, and their Nigerian subsidiary.) [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 5:07 am
The United States was understandably suspicious of Cuba's suspected alignment with the Soviet Union during the peak of the Cold War, and a blockade of Cuba's exportation of sugar to the United States was deemed a viable response to the perceived threat. [9] For example, in 1960, Cuba received a large shipment of crude oil from the Soviet Union in exchange for Cuban sugar. [10] As a result of the exchange, the United States… [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 1:26 pm
The judge also distinguished the United States Supreme Court’s holding in American Express Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 4:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
Louis Martinez, III, No. 10-0426 Shell Oil Company, et al. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
Shell Oil Products Company; Shell Oil Products Company v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
Aug. 29,2008)(Jefferson) (insurance coverage, duty to defend)ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AND NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 4:02 am
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 7:12 pm
This in turn will require the foreign company to have some type of corporate entity or branch office doing business in the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:37 pm
" Charles Drevna, president of the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association (NPRA) said, "President Obama is right to say our nation needs to safely and responsibly develop and produce oil and natural gas in the United States while protecting our environment, and right to say we need to develop a wide range of energy sources for the future. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Charles Sauer looks at Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:59 am
Are our federal courts really less capable than courts in the United States? [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]