Search for: "United States v. American Oil Company"
Results 201 - 220
of 526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2008, 5:07 am
The United States was understandably suspicious of Cuba's suspected alignment with the Soviet Union during the peak of the Cold War, and a blockade of Cuba's exportation of sugar to the United States was deemed a viable response to the perceived threat. [9] For example, in 1960, Cuba received a large shipment of crude oil from the Soviet Union in exchange for Cuban sugar. [10] As a result of the exchange, the United States… [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 4:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 1:26 pm
The judge also distinguished the United States Supreme Court’s holding in American Express Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
Louis Martinez, III, No. 10-0426 Shell Oil Company, et al. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
Shell Oil Products Company; Shell Oil Products Company v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
Aug. 29,2008)(Jefferson) (insurance coverage, duty to defend)ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AND NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 4:02 am
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 7:12 pm
This in turn will require the foreign company to have some type of corporate entity or branch office doing business in the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:37 pm
" Charles Drevna, president of the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association (NPRA) said, "President Obama is right to say our nation needs to safely and responsibly develop and produce oil and natural gas in the United States while protecting our environment, and right to say we need to develop a wide range of energy sources for the future. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Charles Sauer looks at Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am
This is well accepted in Canadian law, and indeed in the law of most countries, including that of the United States. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
Tillerson has close ties with President Vladimir V. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:59 am
Are our federal courts really less capable than courts in the United States? [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 10:17 pm
That standard was most recent reaffirmed by the United States Supreme Court in MedImmune v Genentech, which stated: [Our cases] do not draw the brightest of lines between those declaratory-judgment actions that satisfy the case-or-controversy requirement and those that do not. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 1:01 am
[See Illinois Brick Company et al., v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 6:28 am
An example would be a manufacturer who represented that his products were made in the United States by companies that employ only union labor, whereas in fact they were made in Third World sweatshops. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
IB further asserted that Dillard, shortly after funding the account, began a trading strategy that consisted of buying and selling mining company stocks and oil and mineral futures. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
United States, 12-5271, for yesterday’s grant in McQuiggin v. [read post]
