Search for: "United States v. American Precision Products Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
The damages award included $240,000 for infringing products sold directly into the United States, $2 million for infringing products sold to foreign customers who intended to ultimately sell those products into the United States, and $87 million for infringing products sold abroad and that were not designated for resale into the U.S., although a portion of those sales displaced foreign sales for Hetronic. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
The damages award included $240,000 for infringing products sold directly into the United States, $2 million for infringing products sold to foreign customers who intended to ultimately sell those products into the United States, and $87 million for infringing products sold abroad and that were not designated for resale into the U.S., although a portion of those sales displaced foreign sales for Hetronic. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
United States, 370 U. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:42 am
[19] For example, as the name suggests, the R&D Tax Credit was added to encourage research and development in the United States and as part of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, the Domestic Manufacturing Deduction was added to encourage increasing the quality of manufacturing and jobs in the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
But Industria does not advertise or sell its Zenú or Ranchera products in the United States and there are no market surveys specific to the United States for Zenú or Ranchera. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:47 am
S.A.S. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Those principles, themselves, suggest the elasticity of American law. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
American Honda Motor Co., 505 So.2d 358, 361 (Ala. 1987) (cited in Deere). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
We apologize for not categorizing them by the precise claims involved, but you defense lawyers out there have to have something to justify billing your clients for.Here goes:All (or a lot of different state’s) LawGariety v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:31 am
American Precision Co., 827 F.2d 755 (Fed. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm
PSKS, Inc.) and, of course, campaign finance (Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
United States, 597 F. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:21 pm
Myriad Genetics, Inc., United States Supreme Court (6/13/13)Drugs & Biotech, PatentsMyriad obtained patents after discovering the precise location and sequence of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, mutations of which can dramatically increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancer. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:04 pm
Genzyme Corp., 2010 WL 5297180, at *3 (M.D. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) granted an all-time high 219,614 United States utility patents in 2010 – up 31 percent over 2009. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm
P. 8(a) adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. [read post]
