Search for: "United States v. American Tobacco Co." Results 21 - 40 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm by Mack Sperling
  RAI (which you probably still think of as RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company) is the second largest tobacco company in the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 8:24 pm
The Board therefore deemed that affirmative defense to have been amended to assert priority under the Convention.In British-American Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The title of the article is The Quiet Coup, and it's introductory paragraph changed my whole year… The crash has laid bare many unpleasant truths about the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:47 am by Joe Consumer
  Writes Liptak, The case on commercial speech, Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 5:00 am
Opposer's own expert stated that "the word 'Guantanamera' is most commonly known to the American public and the Cuban-American community in particular as one of the most famous traditional songs in Cuba, known worldwide, including in the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
Sweet Home Chapter of Communities, the Court distinguished its previous decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am by Schachtman
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert is now over 25 years old. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:00 pm by Schachtman
Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co., 295 F.2d 292 (1961); Lartigue v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:44 am by Kali Borkoski
One is the new attempt to challenge the Master Tobacco Settlement Agreement , 10-622, S&M Brands v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
United of Omaha Life Insurance Co., 430 F. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
American Honda Motor Co., 505 So.2d 358, 361 (Ala. 1987) (cited in Deere). [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:04 pm by Bexis
American Tobacco Co., 11 P.3d 626, 631 (Okla. 2000) (failure to make private cause of action retroactive was legislative intent not to permit earlier claims amounting to private enforcement).Governmental authority exclusivity is exactly what Congress mandated with the FDCA when it enacted §337(a). [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm by Schachtman
Although some causal claims may be supported by strong evidence of a biological process with mechanistic evidence, such claims are not common in United States tort litigation. [read post]