Search for: "United States v. American Tobacco Co."
Results 81 - 100
of 177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
United States 13-457Issue: Whether the Secretary of State’s issuance of a passport based on a determination of a person’s United States citizenship is conclusive proof of the passport holder’s citizenship such that it may not be collaterally attacked. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:13 pm
See United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:01 am
One aspect of the ACA is the envisioned effect of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (here’s the USPSTF’s website) role in evaluating screening methods. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
In the consultation report of the neurologist states: “Neurontin is wholly appropriate in this patient. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:25 am
” United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Firearms — Frequently Asked Questions — Unlicensed Persons, http://www.atf.gov/content/firearms-frequently-asked-questions-unlicensed-persons#gca-unlicensed-transfer (citing 18 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Slip at 4, citing United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
., Peterson v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm
American General Life Insurane Co., 2010 WL 7526986, at *5 (N.D. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:04 pm
American Tobacco Co., 11 P.3d 626, 631 (Okla. 2000) (failure to make private cause of action retroactive was legislative intent not to permit earlier claims amounting to private enforcement).Governmental authority exclusivity is exactly what Congress mandated with the FDCA when it enacted §337(a). [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
As I noted in “Confusion Over Causation in Texas” (Aug. 27, 2011), the Texas Supreme Court managed to confuse general and specific causation concepts in its decision in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm
Last Monday, the United States Supreme Court denied a writ of certiorari to review the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling in McReynolds v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm
Ali is another such case:By its own terms, however, the VCPA does not apply to “[a]ny aspect of a consumer transaction which aspect is authorized under laws or regulations of this Commonwealth or the United States, or the formal advisory opinions of any regulatory body or official of this Commonwealth or the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:00 pm
Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co., 295 F.2d 292 (1961); Lartigue v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Brock v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:16 am
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
American Tobacco Co., 168 F.3d 405, 410 (11th Cir.1999) (§1447(c) “is mandatory and may not be disregarded”); Roach v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
American Honda Co., Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm
This is consistent with several court of appeals decisions issued shortly before Dukes, in particular the Seventh Circuit’s decision in American Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
United of Omaha Life Insurance Co., 430 F. [read post]
