Search for: "United States v. American Tobacco Co." Results 101 - 120 of 164
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
British American Tobacco defeats trade mark challenge in the Commonwealth Caribbean: Philip Morris Products S.A. v British American Tobacco (Brands) Limited (jiplp) Brazil Can we feed the hungry on statistics? [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 11:39 am by Schachtman
 constitutional cases, such as Brown v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:09 am by Eugene Volokh
Hadley, 431 F.3d 484, 507 (6th Cir. 2005), and United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am by Bexis
  Here’s why.We recently blogged about new United States Supreme Court certiorari grants of interest. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 8:22 am by Lyle Denniston
The letter was filed to further support BATCo’s petition for rehearing in British American Tobacco Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 7:44 pm by Austen Parrish
  The Court is considering whether to grant certiorari in the case British American Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 7:54 am by John Elwood
The Court’s opinion has implications for a petition that the Court considered at its private conference yesterday, British American Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
 United States (09-979); British American Tobacco v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Government’s Amended Complaint describes a four-decade long conspiracy, dating from at least 1953, to intentionally and wilfully deceive and mislead the American public about, among other things, the harmful nature of tobacco products, the addictive nature of nicotine, and the possibility of manufacturing safer and less addictive tobacco products. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am by Steven M. Taber
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by smtaber
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
College of American Pathologists, 170 F.3d 53, 55 (1st Cir. 1999) (complaint must plead a “factual predicate concrete enough to warrant further proceedings” as “the price of entry, even to discovery”); George Haug Co. v. [read post]