Search for: "United States v. Andreas"
Results 1 - 20
of 400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:30 am
But the ubiquity of single-family zoning in the United States obscures its legally questionable foundation. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Alessandro Maurini, The Missed Revolution at the Origins of the United States (2022). 6. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Rev. 2135 (2023).ICYMI: "Of Course Presidents Are Officers of the United States," says Mark Graber (The Atlantic). [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926). [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:21 am
” Citing the merger clause in the employment agreement, United States Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Finchett-Maddock & Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, To Open Up: A performative rewriting of Pendragon v United Kingdom (1998) 27 EHRR CD 179 , (Helen Dancer, Bonnie Holligan and Helena Howe (eds.) [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am
Although ICJ decisions lack formal precedential effect, I agree with Jamshidi that the ICJ’s decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 12:16 pm
Majekolagbe, Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
Andrea Pin, Canopy Forum: Freedom of Thought and Conscience and the Challenges of AI. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm
Recently, JAMA Network Open published an epidemiologic study (“Williams study”) that explored whether exposure to Agent Orange amoby ng United States military veterans was associated with bladder cancer.[1] The reported study found little to no association, but lay and scientific journalists described the study as finding a “link,”[2] or a “tie,”[3] thus suggesting causality. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
But the absurdity of different aspects of the decision in Missouri v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
But the absurdity of different aspects of the decision in Missouri v. [read post]