Search for: "United States v. Andrews" Results 21 - 40 of 2,349
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2024, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
Rejecting such a "free–floating test for First Amendment coverage," the United States Supreme Court declared in Stevens that the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech "does not extend only to categories of speech that survive an ad hoc balancing of relative social costs and benefits. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 1:44 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there was a hearing in the case of Adams v Johnson. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 6:44 pm by John Elwood
Palestine Liberation Organization and its companion case, United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 8:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Sixth, Trump's pardon of Arpaio concerned his conviction, and "any other offenses under Chapter 21 of Title 18, United States Code that might arise, or be charged, in connection with Melendres v. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
The second largest operating unit at the SEC is the Division of Examinations, which has requested 1,267 positions (1,156 FTEs),[9] for which $594,330,000[10] is earmarked in the Budget Justification. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 6:49 pm by Maria Hook
The issue of fraud could be addressed by the United States court, “with all of the advanced legislative and common law apparatus available to it to do justice between the parties” (at [191]). [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 3:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
We were joined by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), as the NRA appealed this ruling to the United States Supreme Court for the NRA. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm by ngodridge
As November comes to an end, the busy annual reporting and proxy season begins for many public companies. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 8:59 am by Ezra Rosser
Abstract below: In the United States, any defendant facing the possibility of incarceration has the right to be represented by an appointed lawyer if they can’t afford to hire one privately (Argersinger v. [read post]
12 Nov 2024, 3:54 am by SHG
Then again, it has issued rulings such as Dobbs and United States v. [read post]
Add to this the fact that the United States Patent and Trademark Office never requires the description to be adapted, yet patent enforcement obviously works there as well, and you may arrive at the conclusion that there is certainly no “business case” for the adaptation of a description if the claims are amended. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 7:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
The importance of this initial consideration was recently reinforced in an August 2024 decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Continental Casualty Co. v. [read post]