Search for: "United States v. Appalachian Coals"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2020, 7:21 am
In fact, federal lands are owned by the United States, not by any particular federal agency. [read post]
29 May 2013, 1:40 pm
The Mingo Logan Coal Company (Mingo Logan) applied to the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for a permit under section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to discharge dredged or fill material from a mountain-top coal mine in West Virginia into three streams and their tributaries. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 12:02 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia struck down the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Guidance Improving EPA Review of Appalachian Surface Coal Mining Operations Under the Clean Water Act, National Environmental Policy Act, and the Environmental Justice Executive Order on July 31st. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 12:02 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia struck down the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Guidance Improving EPA Review of Appalachian Surface Coal Mining Operations Under the Clean Water Act, National Environmental Policy Act, and the Environmental Justice Executive Order on July 31st. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 6:36 pm
AWR seeks to enjoin a timber salvage sale proposed by the United States Forest Service. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:19 pm
As we all know by now, after the 2010 Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Whole Foods[24] and United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
— Mireya Navarroa, The New York Times, December 22, 2009 Air quality in the New York tri-state region stands to benefit from a court settlement requiring Duke Energy, one of the nation’s largest electric power companies, to drastically cut sulfur dioxide emissions from a coal-fired plant in Indiana, state and federal officials said Tuesday. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
— Mireya Navarroa, The New York Times, December 22, 2009 Air quality in the New York tri-state region stands to benefit from a court settlement requiring Duke Energy, one of the nation’s largest electric power companies, to drastically cut sulfur dioxide emissions from a coal-fired plant in Indiana, state and federal officials said Tuesday. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 6:02 am
" Freeman United Coal Mining Co. v. [read post]
