Search for: "United States v. Apple Inc." Results 201 - 220 of 918
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2019, 2:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
As if to prove Liptak's point, today the Supreme Court decided Apple Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:55 am
 Popular consensus suggests that Mr Gleissner does this with commercial gain in mind [and not for the sheer, heady love of trade mark procedure].Readers might remember Mr Gleissner from such previous trade mark actions as Sherlock Systems CV v Apple Inc (concerning 68 applications to revoke trade marks owned by Apple for non-use) and CKL Holdings Limited v Paper Stacked Limited (the "Alexander" case), which involved two of… [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am by Eric Goldman
  (A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 9:14 am by Anthony Zaller
  In addition, it appears that there were nearly 30 million telephones connected to the phone system in the United States by 1948. 4. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:12 am
Wasn't it the under-apple-tree-sitting Sir Isaac Newton who first said that what goes down must come up? [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:44 am by Florian Mueller
In the United States, SK hynix is represented by Sidley Austin against Netlist. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:42 pm by Florian Mueller
The number of eight cases is due to two complaints having been filed over each of the four patents (one against Apple Inc., the U.S. parent entity, and another one against a couple of European Apple entities). [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:53 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm antitrust trial will begin in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:38 pm by Florian Mueller
(This works the same way in the United States, by the way.)The actual economic impact of this enforcement on Apple remains to be seen. [read post]