Search for: "United States v. Apple Inc." Results 381 - 400 of 842
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2015, 9:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
“This case,” Apple’s lawyers said, “presents issues of surpassing importance to the United States economy. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 2:51 am
The United States now remains the only place where the patent is still valid. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
It was largely the same echo chamber teeming with Google's best friends as in the Federal Circuit proceedings.By contrast, Samsung's petition refers to the following supporters of its Federal Circuit rehearing petition:Dell Inc., eBay Inc., Facebook Inc., Google Inc., Hewlett-Packard Co., Limelight Networks, Inc., Newegg Inc., SAS Institute Inc., the Hispanic Leadership Fund, the National Black Chamber of Commerce, the National… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
* Washington Redskins' Trade Marks tackled: disparaging, says District CourtJani writes up Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
  Yes, said the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Multi Time Machine, Inc., v Amazon.com, Inc.; Amazon Services, LLC (No.2:11-cv-09076-DDP-MAN, here) when it reversed the District Court’s summary judgment order in Amazon’s favour. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Sundara Rajan, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of Glasgow, depicts a fascinating drama in which the principal actors are two literary ladies and, making a relatively rare appearance centre stage, the United States Postal Service. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 3:55 pm by Arizona Employment Law Letter
Here are some recent developments on the sexual orientation front: In June 2013, in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 469 F.3d 993, 1000(Fed. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:20 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
-- Celgard's action against LG relates to United States Patent No. 6,432,586.The post on PatentlyO related to an issue with Jones Day representing both Celgard and Apple  ; from the case--Apple Inc. states that the Jones Day law firm’s representationof Celgard LLC in this infringement suitagainst their lithium battery supplier, LG Chem., Ltd. [read post]