Search for: "United States v. Armstrong" Results 21 - 40 of 352
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2013, 1:50 pm by A. Brian Albritton
Department of Justice (DOJ) announced today that it will intervene in the qui tam False Claims Act suit filed by relator Floyd Landis against Lance Armstrong and others: United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 7:39 am by Victoria VanBuren
In its Reasoned Decision, USADA cited one Court of Arbitration for Sport decision, one United States Court of Appeals, Eight Circuit decision, and one American Arbitration Association decision in support of its claim that the statute of limitations was suspended because Mr. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:54 pm by Harold O'Grady
Tygart and the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) dismissing his complaint alleging due process [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:01 am by Victoria VanBuren
by Renée Kolar Since its inception, the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) has won 58 out of 60 arbitrations against athletes who have contested the agency’s sanctions. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
  On October 10, 2012, the United States Anti-doping Agency (“USADA”)  issued a 202-page reasoned decision describing evidence against Lance Armstrong and alleged rule violations (the “Reasoned Decision”). [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 8:01 am
Fact witnesses were able to show failure to comply with professional standard of care, and jury could disbelieve defense experts, in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:06 pm by Tom Smith
Crimes and infractions are not evenly distributed across racial groups, as the Supreme Court noted in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 2:29 pm by Victoria VanBuren
In the United States, that standard is typically “clear and convincing evidence. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:00 am by Laura Orr
In a January 27th, 2010, opinion, the Oregon Court of Appeals decided:Tim Tubra v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 8:37 am by Samuel Bray
This is the third post on equity in the United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:56 am by Andrew Morgan
United States [SCOTUSblog materials] that a state law conviction on reckless domestic assault is sufficient to bar possession of a firearm under federal law. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 3:02 am by Amy Howe
United States (argued February 29, 2016). [read post]