Search for: "United States v. Armstrong" Results 161 - 180 of 285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2019, 6:32 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The claim is made that the purpose of condemnation is to make sure that the costs of public projects are not borne by individual property (correct, see Armstrong v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:19 pm by Mike
Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong stated that the redactions were sufficient to give the court jurisdiction to hear the case.   [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:19 pm
United States Dept. of Interior, No. 08-30069 (5th Cir. [read post]