Search for: "United States v. Arthur Andersen & Co." Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 6:01 am
But now, in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:27 am by Russell Beck
Arthur Andersen LLP, closing a loophole that had been opened and expanded by the United States District Courts in California, which had allowed the enforcement of noncompetes in certain circumstances. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
United States (drug felony, misdemeanor, facilitate, cellular phone) Dean, Christopher M. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 10:00 pm
Massey Coal Company, Inc., et al. (08-22) - duty of elected judge to disqualify from case in which a major campaign donor has an interest Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
First up is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 4:26 am
Arthur Andersen & Co., 72 F.3d 1085, 1093 (2d Cir. 1995) ("Whether the rights belong to the debtor . . . is a question of state law. [read post]